<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>Antiaging Labs Field Notes</title>
  <link>https://antiaging-labs.com/learn</link>
  <atom:link href="https://antiaging-labs.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>The latest longevity and biomarker research, decoded in plain English. New posts from Antiaging Labs Field Notes.</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
  
  <item>
    <title>Rethinking mitochondrial aging: what 750,000 genomes tell us about longevity</title>
    <link>https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/mitochondrial-aging</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/mitochondrial-aging</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <category>Research</category>
    <description><![CDATA[Gupta et al. (Nature 2026) analyzed 736,000 whole-genome sequences and upended the oxidative-damage theory of mitochondrial aging. Blood mtSNV mutations look like replication errors amplified by clonal hematopoiesis, not wear-and-tear.]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>For decades, mitochondrial aging was explained as oxidative rust. A new <em>Nature</em> study of 736,000 people says blood mtDNA mutations look like replication copy-errors amplified by clonal hematopoiesis in bone marrow, not daily wear-and-tear.</p>
      <p><strong>What changed:</strong> mutations spike around age 60 because hidden stem-cell clones expand, not because cells suddenly start rusting. That reframes antioxidants, mitophagy, and what to track next.</p>
      <p><a href="https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/mitochondrial-aging">Read the full Field Note →</a></p>
    ]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The four levers that actually move your biomarkers in 90 days</title>
    <link>https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/four-levers</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/four-levers</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <category>Interventions</category>
    <description><![CDATA[Almost everything you can change runs through four levers: nutrition, training, sleep, and a short list of supplements. What the evidence supports, ranked by how much it moves the needle.]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>Almost everything you can change runs through four levers: nutrition, training, sleep, and a short list of supplements.</p>
      <p>We rank what the evidence actually supports, and how much each lever moves the needle in a 90-day measured loop.</p>
      <p><a href="https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/four-levers">Read the full Field Note →</a></p>
    ]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biological age, honestly: what PhenoAge can and can't tell you</title>
    <link>https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/biological-age</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/biological-age</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <category>Measurement</category>
    <description><![CDATA[Biological-age scores are real science and routinely oversold. What PhenoAge measures, what an epigenetic clock is, and how to read your number without fooling yourself.]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>Biological-age scores are real science and routinely oversold.</p>
      <p>What PhenoAge measures, what an epigenetic clock is, and how to read your number without fooling yourself.</p>
      <p><a href="https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/biological-age">Read the full Field Note →</a></p>
    ]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Your blood report uses the wrong reference ranges</title>
    <link>https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/reference-ranges</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/reference-ranges</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <category>Biomarkers</category>
    <description><![CDATA[Normal on a lab report is the average of everyone who walked into a lab, the unwell included. Optimal is a different number. Why your report can say fine when you're not.]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>Normal on a lab report is the average of everyone who walked into a lab, the unwell included. Optimal is a different number.</p>
      <p>Why your report can say fine when you're not, and what to look at instead.</p>
      <p><a href="https://antiaging-labs.com/learn/reference-ranges">Read the full Field Note →</a></p>
    ]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
